Atenção

Fechar

Biblioteca

Artigos Técnicos

Artigo Científico | Microscopia e Difração de Raios X | Inglês | 18/04/2001

A Comparison between the Warren-Averbach Method and Alternate Methods for X-Ray Diffraction Microstructure Analysis of Polycrystalline Specimens

Autores: Alvaro Saavedra, Bojan Marinkovic, Fernando Cosme Rizzo Assunção, Roberto Ribeiro de Avillez

Palavras-chave: bohmite, convolution profile fitting methods, size-strain analysis, warren-averbach method, x-ray diffraction

Resumo: The fundamental parameters approach is used to simulate the instrument contribution to the X-Ray diffraction profile. This procedure eliminates the need to experimentally prepare a reference sample of the studied crystalline material when using the Warren-Averbach method to investigate microstrutural parameters. The Warren-Averbach method is also compared to the Balzar and Enzo methods, two other popular methods of size-strain analysis. The analysis was carried out using bohmite powder having two different nominal average crystallite sizes, 80 Å and 200 Å. A 50%-50% mixture of these materials was used as a third sample. The proposed simulation procedure provides good results and is much faster to implement than the usual procedure that includes the preparation of a reference. For larger crystallite sizes, the results calculated from the Warren-Averbach method for the volume-weighted average crystallite size differs significantly from the ones obtained from the Balzar and Enzo methods. The limitations of the Balzar and Enzo methods are also discussed.

Clique aqui para ler na íntegra

Materials Research

« Voltar